Friends of the Cawthra Bush & Greater Mississauga Area
• where my videos are posted Pages of Special Interest; • • Other Table of Contents; |
The Burnhamthorpe Cat Shelter; TABLE OF CONTENTS;
As this is a large work, in progress, much of the detail work, the
comments regarding the material post on this web-site, that will ease comprehension,
will have to wait.
I would like to thank the volunteers who helped me put this web-site together, retyped news articles and those you supplied the historical material that recorded this most interesting issue. Boingdragon Counters Some point form notes: - Were the Stevenses or Lois (The Cat Lady), overboard animal lover? You know the kind, can't have enough cats or dogs to the point they can not look after them? NO. Before people started to dumping loads of cats (kittens mostly), suddenly on them, a cat and dog was just fine thank you very much. They had a big house, there was a big need and lots of people to help fill it up. WHAT DID THE CAT SHELTER COST THE STEVENSES, IN PARTICULAR LOIS? * It cost them their marriage. They had married in 1983 and the divorce was started in 1991. The stress of dealing with unreasonable politicians was too much. Especially the humiliation heaped on Brain Stevens, who attended all the meetings and spoke at most. He is educated man, an engineer, who appealed to Mississauga politicians with reason and got abuse in return. * Their privacy. In fall 1983 cats, mostly kittens started to show up, in one case a bag of kittens was thrown off the Burnhamthorpe bridge. 1986 the work on the Cattery had begun. An inquire was made to the City if such a building could be built and no problem was the answer. From the fall of 1983 on more and more people showed up with cats or to adopt them. Then when the City put the spot light on them, it was a near endless parade through their home. Public speaking and if it was in front of our politicians, it would likely be abusive. Like most people, the Stevens were not public people by nature. * The Stevenses sunk more then $40,000 of their own money into the repair and up keep of a City rental home. * More then $7,000 on a lawyer to defend
the City's action that the City abandoned.
WHAT ABOUT CITY PROMISES / STATEMENTS? * The City went against its own policy to not enforce by-laws unless there was a complaint. * The City first claimed it would take many tens of thousands to repair the Bird house to bring it up to City standards. Then it was only $8,000 for repairs that the City had to do, were they done? NO. What work was done, was done by the Stevens and in one case, the repair to the garage was paid for by the City after a Stevens family member did the work. If that work really needed to be done, to prevent the house from being condemned then why didn't the City either do the repairs or condemn the house???? The City spent thousands on consultants to study the Stevens home (or the Bird house), more then haft what is was finally decided would make it safe to live in. All totaled the money spent by City staff and high priced lawyers to try and remove the Stevens could easily have repaired the Bird house. The house was safe, the City was just making up (lying) stories to fool people. The City can't come out and said it was wrong after the studies, so the story became, the city was going to tear it down away. What a brainless waste of money. Mississauga City hall loves to carry on about how financially responsible the City is but here the City is saying the house has to come down no matter what. As the consultants said the home was in good shape, contradicting City staff, the City had to come up with a new reason to stop the Stevens from running a cat shelter. The City claimed they need the house demolished as they were going to build a Public Gardens. To this day they have not even got a plan for the Public Garden and one of the reasons for the delay, was concern over the deer in the area. In all this time the City has lost the services of the Stevens and their supports in dealing with homeless cats and the years of rent money the Stevens' were paying. This is financial responsible? * It was reported in the newspapers, time and time again that the City was going to help this family relocate, did the City? Lois Stevens was left without a husband, next to nothing in the way of money and no help from the City for a place to live!! Hazel did what many men have done to unwanted wives in the past, kick them into the street to fend for themselves, with nothing. If it was not for Lois's friends (and her own hard work), putting on a fund raising Bingo, she would not have not been able to afford a place to move into. * Is there a new shelter to replace the Cattery?
NO, of course not, that was just a Hazel political promise, designed to
fool people into not supporting this issue.
WHAT DID IT COST CITY POLITICIANS? * Mississaugans saw that there was no end of money to be spent on stopping the efforts of good SAMARITANS but none for justice. * Hazel was one of the first female politicians and one who was very keen to try and prove the myth that women are naturally better managers then men, as they can resolve problems without conflict or argument. To this day she measures her success by hiding disagreement to fool people into thinking her form of government is better. In fact it can be said her self worth is tied to always presenting the image of an ordered government without fighting, to the public. Hazel's better way and her place in history. So Hazel wants more then anything else to perpetuate this illusion, that her, female methods, make her better at problem solving and a manager. Then David Culham starts to stand up for the constituents in his Ward and the City in general and openly disagreeing with the Boss Lady! It is one thing to disagree with Big Boss lady but to expose her methods in details so people could learn from them??? That is a crime!! There was another Councillor, Larry Taylor and how by all intelligent accounts, he was shafted by Hazel for asking too many questions and not being one of Hazel's team. The media accounts of this open conflict would last for years and Hazel doesn't forget. Records show that in City Council our elected official were rude, abusive, insulting and often in attack mode against the members of the community when they spoke in Council chambers. Intimidation can go along way. Culham was a changed man after this fight, before he suddenly left politics, in 2000. It is a sad day when even a Councillor can't fight City Hall or the person who runs City Hall. What was shown to the world was the true face of Council. When Mississaugans addressed Council or their elected politicians they were not met with the fine art of intellectual and reasonable debate and discussion. No, they were subjected to attacks from a pack of predators who just didn't care how they get their way or won. The crafty skills of a predator, wise in the ways of manipulation and deception. And of course the insult or put down, often noted in the documents as City politicians weapon of choice. It works wonders with those who have misplaced their trust and respect by blindly granting to politicians. Great shock value. Whatever the reason to get people to give up fighting, even leaving in total disgust is a acceptable victory. Mississaugans were under the false idea they could deal with the issue without being sucked into the quicksand of politics, how wrong they were. - Another interesting point about this whole issue is how it played out. City of Mississauga politicians, many of whom are still in power today, were petitioned by many very knowledgeable polite professionals and leaders in the animal care community. By soft spoken seniors who can before City Council to reason with their elected officials. Even the Councillor Culham, a veteran of public service and Council, was treated by fellow Councillors like the village idiot. Councillors (Hazel's team), showed Mississaugans no respect and it was only when a lawyer was thrown in their face did they back down. Often people say I am too assertive or confrontational to lead a group in Mississauga. I must be so, only because I know how the City treats the public and how City Hall will misled me or dismiss our issues with falsehoods or other frivolous and vexatious reasons. In this issue, I played no part at all, so it can't be said my methods contributed to the failure of reason or this cause. The City of Mississauga politicians refused to listen to reason from the community, no mater how polite Mississaugans were. The methods I am told to use, were used in the Cat Shelter issue, to little effect. Based on this case, it appears I am being told how to fail and make it easy for politicians to sweep the issues under the rug. To get on with something more important, like more development in Mississauga and less of Mother Nature. - The one reason that comes up most often about the City shut down the Cat Shelter (after the Mayor appears hates animals), is that the Cat Shelter was in competition with the City animal control who were selling cats to the public. The Cat Shelter was doing free adoptions. The cats had all their shots, a medical exam, spay or neuter done before hand and were well looked after in the cattery. All at no cost to the tax payers. BUT they were in competition with a City service, that sold cats and dogs to the public! And when the City is run like a business, who have to act like a business. Eliminate the competition! There is more then one way to close a Cat Shelter and in the end it was not for logical or reasonable reasons, it was just, that was the way the Mayor wanted it to be. - Here is a rare picture taken of the Hazel McCallion and David Culham in a disagreement, taken with a special anthropomorphic lens. - Who knows, maybe the Cat Shelter is something that Hazel is very proud of. She proved she could destroy "do-gooders" in the community who opposed her will/rule, with only logical and reason on their side. That she could effectively kill cats, often a pet that people care for and not lose any popularity. Maybe she feels this was her finest hour.
Overall list of dates, documents and events Newspaper articles
Letters
Petitions & Public notices
City records
Photographs
Due to the shear size of this issue, I have not had time to deal with the first person accounts. So the story, for now, will be told through the documents of the day and they are quite the story tellers. This is a work in progress, that depends on volunteers retyping and gathering records of this very interesting story - it will grow as time goes on - if you wish to help let me know. Not all items have material for them, yet or will be posted on the internet. Some dated events are from City documents and may not be entirely accurate. As this is the beginning events/details listed may not be accurate, as they could have been noted in a secondary documents. Jul. 15, 1981
1982
1983
Oct. 1984
Oct. 22, 1988
Nov. 23,
1988
Letter
Nov. 24,
1988
Letter
Nov. 25,
1988
Article - Mississauga News
Dec. 29, 1988
Jan.
1989
Article - Mississauga News
Jan. 5, 1989
Meeting
Jan. 9, 1989 ?
Meeting
Jan. 10, 1989
Letter
Jan. 10, 1989
Letter
Jan. 11, 1989
Meeting
Jan. 20, 1989
Letter
Jan. 30, 1989
Feb. 13, 1989
Meeting
Mar. 7,
1989
Memorandum
Apr. 12,
1989
Article - Mississauga News
Apr. 12, 1989
Article - Mississauga News
Apr. 26, 1989
Meeting
Apr. 28, 1989
Letter
Apr. 30, 1989
Letter
May 8, 1989 Mon.
Meeting
May 10, 1989
Article - Mississauga News
May 10, 1989
Letter to Editor - Mississauga News
May 15, 1989 Mon.
Visit by City Council
May 19,
1989
Memorandum (9 pages)
May 23, 1989 Tues.
Meeting
May 24, 1989
Letter
May 25, 1989
Letter
Jun. 14, 1989
Meeting
Jun.
16, 1989
Article - Mississauga News
Jun. 15, 1989
Jun. 15, 1989
Letter
Jun. 15,
1989
Article - Toronto Star
Jun. 18, 1989
Letter
Jun. 18, 1989
Letter
Jun. 18, 1989
Letter
Jun. 18, 1989
Letter
Jun. 18, 1989
Letter
Jun. 19, 1989
Letter
Jun. 19, 1989
Letter
Jun. 19, 1989
Letter
Jun. 26, 1989
July
23,1989
Article - Mississauga News
Jul. 26,
1989
Article - Mississauga News
Jul. 28, 1989
Letter
Aug.
1, 1989
It also talks about a new animal shelter to be built in Mississauga, along with a quote from the Mayor about the Ontario Humane Society "re-establishing a shelter". Of course, to this day, it has not happened. Aug. 1,
1989
Letter
Aug. 16, 1989 Wed.
Meeting
Aug. 16, 1989
Letter
Aug.
18, 1989 Fri.
Editorial - Mississauga News
Aug.
18, 1989 Fri.
Article - Mississauga News
Aug. 18,
1989 Fri.
Article - Mississauga News
Aug.
30, 1989
Editorial - Mississauga News
Sept. 6, 1989
Article - Mississauga News
Sept. 6, 1989 at 2:00pm
Meeting
Sept. 20, 1989
Meeting
Sept. 25, 1989
Meeting
Sept.
27, 1989
Article - Mississauga News
Oct. ??
1989
Letter to Editor - Mississauga News
Oct. 9, 1989
Letter
Oct.
18, 1989
Editorial - Mississauga News
Oct. 23, 1989 Mon.
7:00pm or 7:30?
Meeting
Oct. 25,
1989
Article - Mississauga News
Oct.
25, 1989
Editorial - Mississauga News
Oct. 27, 1989
Letter
Oct. 31, 1989
Nov.
1, 1989
Editorial - Mississauga News
Nov. 1,
1989 Sat
Article - Mississauga News
Nov. 9, 1989
Nov. 12,
1989
Letter
Nov. 15,
1989
News notice - Mississauga News
Nov. 16,
1989
Letter to Editor - Mississauga News
Nov. 16, 1989
Article - Mississauga News
Nov. 20, 1989
Jan. 15, 1990
Letter
Jan. 24, 1990
Article - Mississauga News
Jan. 24, 1990
Article - Mississauga News
Feb. 22,
1990
Article - Toronto Star
Feb. 23, 1990
Article - ?
Apr. 4,
1990 Wed.
Article - Mississauga News
Apr. 9,
1990
Article - Toronto Star
Apr.
11, 1990
Article - Mississauga News
Apr. 11,
1990
Article - Mississauga News
May 31,
1990
Article - Toronto Star
Jan. 1991
Letter to Editor - Mississauga News
Jan.
16, 1991
Article - Mississauga News
Jan. 16,
1991
Editorial - Mississauga News
1989
Letter to Editor - Mississauga
News
1989
Article - Toronto Sun
1989
Letter to Editor - Mississauga News
19??
Editorial - Mississauga News
1989
Letter to Editor - Mississauga News
19??
Article - Mississauga News
19??
Article - Mississauga News
1989
Article - Toronto Star
19??
Letter to Editor - Mississauga News?
or Star?
1989
Letter
1989
PLEEASSE SIGN OUR PETITION It will make a difference! Home page - Main Table of Contents - Back to Top |
Your
Financial Donations are Greatly Appreciated
Now Accepting Pay Pal
•
|